2 Commits

Include renames

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
adminandClaude Opus 5.5	0d8fd6ff52	Let the agent use the graph, scene and project commands (#429) ... The agent knew 23 of the editor's commands. It could not point a Variables node at a variable, group nodes, edit ports, transitions, containers, colliders or the project settings. Stage 5a brings the catalog to 85 commands in five areas and keeps every answer short. - The catalog lists names and descriptions only. With a query (an area or command names) it adds the arguments. All schemas at once would pass the 60 000 character limit of one answer. - add_port points a Variables node at a variable. The port takes the variable's kind, and an unknown name is refused with the list of the ones that exist. - add_group and add_comment take nodes instead of coordinates. They follow the nodes after the arrange step, in the same undo step. - The rule for which list a port picks from moved into portChoices.ts. Inspector and agent now share it. - The frame of a group around nodes moved into annotationDrag.ts, so the button and the agent get the same frame. - list_assets returns the project settings. get_asset shows the content of placed containers with the ids overrides need. get_graph shows declared ports and frame colors. - A new node is placed at the height of its port, in the free spot whose links cross the fewest others. A source goes left of the node it feeds. Before, new nodes always went right of the rest. - Arrange breaks a tie in crossings by putting the flow on top, and exec links pull harder when a column is sorted. - A comment over a group keeps clear of the group's title bar. - The agent's instructions and lint_graph ask to look at crossings too and to call arrange_graph when there are more than needed. Left out on purpose: file assets (no upload), paste from the clipboard, internal wrapper commands and switching plugins on. Found on the way: - Variable commands on a Struct asset did not run through WithStructTypes. New fields did not reach variables of that type. - A query "variables" also matched set_variables_scope. A word that names an area now means only that area. Tests: - agent-catalog (new, 10), agent-edit, graph-arrange (3 new) and relay green. 11 bends of the code, all red. - e2e 71 on atx: 22/22, the new check sees port speed and a group around all 4 drawn nodes. - Live on a test project: a speed variable of 300 moved the player to x 150.03 in 0.5 s. A re-placed Variables node landed below Axis input with 4 crossings instead of 7. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-10-18 16:01:15 +02:00
rootandClaude Opus 5	8143130ed2	A shared value belongs to no behavior, so it becomes an asset of its own (#91) ... This reverses the design of the previous commit. `PropertyDef.scope` is gone without replacement: a behavior variable is an object property again, without exception, and sharing is something you point at rather than something you declare twice. A **Variables asset** is declarations and nothing else -- no graph, no position, never placed, no tab of its own (`TAB_OF_ASSET` is already `Partial<>`, so that costs no line). A `Variables` node names one through its new `variablesAsset` setting, empty meaning the behavior's own variables as before, and then reads and writes one value per key for the whole run. Its property list follows the chosen source, which was the actual request: a value another graph declared is now offerable, where before every participant had to declare the name itself. That deletes more than it adds (-72 lines net): `globalConflicts` and its run-stopping kind clash, `SetVariableScopeCommand`, the scope picker, both object-inspector filters and the "shared by the whole run" note on the placed object. A typo is no longer a silent second variable -- naming an asset is picking from a list. And two Variables assets may carry the same key without meeting, because the asset is the key, not the name. The one shape it copies is the one that already existed: `Set state` picks its machine the same way. Lifetime is unchanged. The bag is built at `BehaviorSystem.start()` from the declarations and never written back, so playing in the editor cannot change the project -- which is the whole reason a counter must not be an object property (`World.syncToModel` would `commit()` it, and the coin counter would stand at 7 for good). Full symmetry across that gap, without mirroring anything. Two named wires: `Inspector.liveVariables` shows the values as they stand while a run is on and falls back to the declarations when it ends, and `adoptDeclarations()` takes a key into the run *only where the document changed it since the last sync*. Without that condition any unrelated project edit would snap a running counter back to its starting value; a counter-test bends exactly that and falls over. Nothing was ever cached, incidentally: `GraphInterpreter` only pulse-caches nodes without a `read`, and the variable node has one. The wire was missing. The state machine `Scope` row is now an ordinary `enum` row through `createFieldRow`. It was hand-built from an `HStack` with a ghost dropdown and began ~34px left of every value above it; the explanations beside `Local` and `Global` are gone from the menu, the sentence below the row keeps saying it. Machine scope is otherwise untouched -- `StateMachineAsset.scope`, `SetMachineScopeCommand`, `stateBag()` and its persistence all stand, so #59 stays closed as built and `Scope` as a type now carries machines alone. Six counter-proofs, each biting at its own guard. One of them did not bite at first: the suggestion list was computed twice, in `nodeSection` and `portSection`, so only the browser test covered the request itself. It is one named function now, `variableChoices`, with a unit test of its own. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-09-14 18:05:36 +02:00